By Gary Direnfeld, MSW, RSW
There is a dynamic that naturally evolves when parents only see lawyers to determine
their ongoing relationship to children, post separation or divorce.
Regardless of the disposition of the lawyer, on the mind of the parent, is
winning or coming away with a particular outcome. The parent races to stake
a claim. The parent meets the lawyer, states his or her case, convinces the
lawyer of the righteousness of the claim and thus retains the lawyer to fight
the battle.
When one parent has staked a claim and begun battle the other parent will naturally
defend him or herself. Given that most people view the best defense as a good
offence, the other parent has to stake a bigger claim. In the process, each
parent resorts to assailing the other while holding his or herself out as the
better parent. The fight is on and hopes fade.
Lawyers are experts at law. Some are also experts at negotiation. Certainly
others are expert at litigation. However, from a child’s view, relationships
with their parents are generally non-negotiable. From the child’s view
and already feeling their relationships are threatened, their goal is to see
relationships remain intact; that neither parent hurts the other; and that they
can enjoy their lives reasonably with both parents with as little disruption
as possible.
The more involved parents are in battle and the more hurt they are, the greater
the likelihood the children’s lives are emotionally and psychologically
disrupted. The more disrupted their lives, the more difficult it is for them
to get on with the tasks of childhood, learning and socialization. Therefore,
the greater the parental conflict, the greater the risk of school and social
difficulties. Given childhood is the time of life for the development of cognitive
and social skills necessary for adult life, those children whose learning and
socialization is disrupted are then also at greater risk of problems in adulthood,
not having acquired the necessary skills during childhood.
Separated parents are encouraged to see a social worker or attend educational
programs aimed at helping them understand issues related to settling such matters.
Interestingly, some jurisdictions require parents involved in contested custody
and access matters to attend such programs.
The objective in meeting with a social worker or attending a program is to
minimize the risk of conflict by learning about of the consequences of various
courses of action and by learning about the range of alternatives for restructure
family life, children’s time between parents and processes for decision
making. The goal is to resolve matters more amicably, thus alleviating stressors
on the child to provide for better psychosocial outcomes.
Consider the fact that early childhood educators and teachers don’t want
children to fight their battles in the sandbox. They want them to learn to get
along and play nicely. This is what children learn and what they expect to see
in their parents. When parents do otherwise, their influence will outweigh the
early childhood educators and teachers. Children will learn to battle and fight,
particularly with loved ones and peers, as that will be their role model.
Social problems require expertise with social solutions. Use your social worker
or educational program to learn and develop a parenting plan that reduces risks
while leaving relationships intact. Use your lawyer to write up the terms of
your agreement if necessary or to understand rights and obligations. If matters
continue to be contested, your lawyer can help you with the legal process.
Social workers, programs and lawyers each have a role. Use them all wisely
and appropriately.