|
|
|
|
Dividing the Marital Estate
Dividing the Marital Estate
By Maury D. Beaulier, Esq.
Index
Overview
Valuing the Marital Estate
Dividing the Marital
Estate
Not All Assets are Created Equal
Overview
Marital property laws in Minnesota and Wisconsin define the
marital estate (community property) as any asset acquired during the marriage
whether that asset is held in the name of either party or both. This
specifically includes real estate, cars, pensions, 401K plans, business
interests, stocks, bonds, stock options, dogs, cats, chairs, collectibles and
bank accounts etc . . . Property that does not have to be divided in divorce is
called "non-marital property." Non-marital assets are generally defined as
anything acquired by a spouse before the marriage, or during the marriage by
gift, devise or bequest.
Valuing the Marital
Estate
In most cases, the marital estate is divided equally unless
there is written and binding pre-nuptial agreement to the contrary. To divide
the marital estate, it is first necessary to determine the equity of the assets.
The equity is determined by arriving at a fair market value (how much would a
buyer be willing to pay) and subtracting out any secured encumbrances. For
example the equity in a home could be determined by taking an appraised value
and subtracting out the secured mortgage, second mortgage, secured lines or
credit, home equity loans and outstanding property taxes.
Valuing assets may require the aid of an appraiser. To reduce
costs, it is often most effective for the parties to jointly choose an appraiser
and divide that expense. Appraisers are available to value real estate,
vehicles, business interests, collectibles and other assets.
Dividing the Marital
Estate
Once you have determined the relative values and encumbrances
of the assets, they can be divided by creating a spreadsheet (See
Chart A below). he equity of any asset awarded to a party
is offset by the payment of any debt obligation by the party to ideally arrive
at an equal property division.. In this fashion, it is not necessary to divide
each asset equally. It is only necessary that each party receives a
substantially equal share of the marital estate. Ideally, the division of assets
and debts will result in totals that are equal. When that does not occur, such
as in the chart below, one spouse may be required to make a cash payment to
equalize the division of assets. Often this is accomplished with the party
awarded the homestead refinancing the mortgage in an amount sufficient to retire
the other spouse's interest. In the example below, wife could refinance to pay
the husband the sum of $6,500 (one half of the difference between the values
awarded to the wife and the husband.)
Chart A
|
ASSET/LIABILITY |
Value Awarded to
WIFE |
Value Awarded to
HUSBAND |
| House (Value $200,000 - Mortgage
140,000= $60,000) |
$60,000 |
|
| 2000 Toyoto Tercel
(Value $18,000 - Loan $10,000= $8,000) |
|
$8,000 |
| 1996 Honda Accord (Value $10,000 -
Loan $11,000= -$1,000) |
(1,000) |
|
| Ford F-150 (Leased) |
|
$0 |
| 401K |
|
$25,000 |
| Pension |
|
$5,000 |
| Stocks |
|
$2,000 |
| Visa Card |
($3,000) |
|
| Mastercard |
($3,000) |
|
| Jewelry |
$500 |
|
| Tools |
|
$2,000 |
| Household Furnishings |
$5,000 |
$3,500 |
|
TOTAL |
$58,500 |
$45,500 |
Not All
Assets Are Created Equal.
It is important to recognize in dividing property that not all
property is created equal. You must always consider the tax effect of the asset
award. For example, one stock account with a value of $15,000 may not be equal
to another stock account with the value of $15,000. If the first account started
out with a value of $5,000, when the account is liquidated (the stock is sold)
the owner would be required to pay taxes on the increase in value. In this
example, the gain is $10,000. This is called a capital gains tax. By contrast,
if the stock in the second account was purchased for $20,000 and the value
dropped to $15,000, upon liquidation, the owner could write off a $5,000 loss on
taxes. As a result, there is a greater benefit to receiving the account that
performed poorly since the recipient would not only receive the value of the
stock but a tax write off as well.
|
DivorceInteractive.com tries to provide
quality information, but cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or adequacy
of the information, opinions or other content posted on the site. It is not
intended as a substitute for and should not be relied upon as legal, financial,
accounting, tax, medical or other professional advice. It should not be
construed as establishing a professional-client or professional-patient
relationship. The applicability of legal principles is subject to amendment by
the legislature, interpretation by the courts and different application by
different judges and may differ substantially in individual situations or
different states. Before acting on what you have read, it is important to obtain
appropriate professional advice about your particular situation and facts.
Access to and use of DivorceInteractive.com is subject to additional
Terms and Conditions. DivorceInteractive.com
is a secure site and respects your Privacy.
Home |
Advertise With Us |
Professional & Resource Directory
Divorce News | Glossary | Divorce Discussion Forums
Change Area Code | Terms & Conditions/Legal Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | About Us |
Contact Us
© 2001-2010
DivorceInteractive.com All Rights Reserved.
|