After parental separation, a consistent relationship between child and both
parents is best. A parent entering and leaving a child’s life can be disruptive
for the child and for the life of the other parent. Some folks may feel that
upon being absent for some period of time, the absent parent should not be allowed
back into the child’s life. In some situations, the active parent has
remarried and the new partner has formed a meaningful and significant attachment
to the child. The re-introduction of the absent parent therefore threatens to
not only cause emotional turmoil to the child, by may be a perceived threat
to the relationship between child and new partner. Needless-to-say, there can
be a tangle of intense feelings on all sides.
Generally speaking, the social science literature supports the notion that
children fare better in the long run with secure attachments to both parents.
This is true even in the face of many parental difficulties, but assuming that
neither parent is outright abusive. In the case of an absent parent wanting
to re-enter a child’s life, it may be difficult to determine what is best
for the child. Hence the decision may rest upon the clinical judgment of an
assessor. The challenge in assessing these cases is separating parental issues
of anger, jealousy and the like, from the needs and interests of the child.
At times it is parental issues that require more management than the child’s
renewed relationship with the absent parent.
In the event it appears that the relationship between child and absent parent
will be re-established, certain precautions and structures can be put in place
to allay concerns, facilitate the process and provide safeguards. Pre-meeting
conditions can include:
1. Abstinence from alcohol or drugs where a parent is known to abuse such substances.
2. Drug testing for a parent known to abuse drugs.
3. Counseling for the above, if at issue.
4. Anger management if anger issues are identified.
5. Attendance at a parenting course.
Then, with regard to a process for facilitating the relationship between absent
parent and child:
1. Consider a counseling process where the counselor meets the absent parent
alone. This meeting or series of meetings is to establish motive and also to
provide opportunity for education as to the needs of the child in question.
2. Concurrently there should be a meeting or series of meetings with the same
counselor and the active parent and partner to discuss and prepare them, followed
by a meeting with the child to discuss concerns and issues. The purpose of counseling
is not to curtail the process, but to continue to discuss and develop strategies
to mange change in view of concerns.
3. Finally, the child meets with the absent parent under the auspices of the
counselor. Several future meetings can occur with the counselor or under supervision
through a designated supervision center if considered necessary.
4. Then assuming all goes well, visits can progress to unsupervised.
Hence the issue may not be withholding the relationship, but facilitating it
through a safe and structured process. If the absent parent abides by the process,
benefits to the child can significantly outweigh the loss of this parent-child
relationship. If the absent parent proves incapable of meeting the requirements
and abiding by the safeguards, then there are supports in place to help the
child and family adjust. If the absent parent refuses to follow the process
or gets into trouble along the way, the process can be modified or even ended.
These situations are balancing acts with no easy solution. The challenge is
to manage the process as delicately as possible. The above process may help.